A Massachusetts-based advisor is suing Hightower, accusing the agency of making an attempt to push him out of his job due to his age.
In accordance with SEC data, Glenn Frank filed swimsuit in Massachusetts state courtroom final week towards Hightower Holdings and Lexington Wealth Administration, the agency he’s labored for since 2010. (Hightower acquired the agency in 2019 through a strategic funding.)
In accordance with Frank’s grievance, over the previous few years, Hightower “has regularly ‘phased’” Frank out of working along with his purchasers to profit youthful advisors within the agency. (Frank is 69 years previous, based on the grievance.) Hightower declined to remark, citing that it doesn’t talk about pending litigation.
Frank claimed he caused 50 of his purchasers to Lexington when he joined from Wells Fargo in 2010 and stated his purchasers typically adopted him from agency to agency over time. In accordance with Frank, his purchasers didn’t care whose identify is on the door “so long as Glenn is behind it.”
Beginning in 2016, Frank reduce his work hours however claimed his titles and shopper tasks stayed the identical. Nevertheless, previously a number of years, Frank alleged Lexington started altering his position on shopper providers groups to “member emeritus” with out consulting him; in observe, the change eliminated Frank from having the ultimate say about his shopper accounts, based on the swimsuit.
Adjustments continued after Hightower acquired Lexington in 2019; in 2021, the agency eliminated Frank from its Funding Committee with out telling him or his purchasers. When he realized what occurred, agency leaders instructed Frank the change was to make room for ‘youthful’ advisors on the committee, based on the swimsuit.
In accordance with Frank, in conferences, agency leaders mentioned that Frank and the agency heads had been all getting old, and there was a must “flip over the reins” to youthful advisors so the agency would proceed to develop.
“Mr. Frank was instructed that if he didn’t take a task subordinate to that of the youthful advisors, he could be faraway from his purchasers’ service groups fully,” the grievance learn.
Frank claimed Hightower went additional, allegedly telling purchasers that Frank was unavailable or vacationing in Florida, eradicating Frank from his personal accounts and giving them to youthful advisors on the agency with out notifying Frank. Hightower additionally moved to chop Frank’s compensation and hours, based on the swimsuit.
“Hightower has knowledgeable Mr. Frank that it is going to be up[ to the younger advisers to determine whether, and to what extent, Mr. Frank will be included in communications with his long-standing clients,” the complaint read.
Frank submitted an internal complaint with Hightower’s Human Resources Department alleging age discrimination but quickly heard back that the demotion was not deemed discrimination. In March, Frank informed the firm’s leaders he intended to file a complaint with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, according to the complaint.
Later that day, Frank alleges Hightower suspended him “purportedly because of an email that Mr. Frank sent to clients.” Frank’s attorneys declined to comment on this story.
But even if Frank wanted to leave (and if his clients wanted to join him), he argues he is constrained by Hightower’s non-solicitation covenants, which purportedly ban him from soliciting any customers for a year after he leaves the firm (including the clients he worked with before joining Lexington and subsequently Hightower).
As of now, Frank claims he is still at Lexington, though his salary is cut in half with Hightower continuing to “restrict and impede his interactions with his own clients.” As a part of the suit, he’s seeking an injunction to stop Hightower from enforcing its non-solicitation and restrictive covenant agreements.