Automattic CEO and WordPress co-creator Matt Mullenweg unleashed a scathing assault on a rival agency this week, calling WP Engine a “most cancers to WordPress.”
Mullenweg criticized the corporate — which has been commercializing the open supply WordPress challenge since 2010 — for profiteering with out giving a lot again, whereas additionally disabling key options that make WordPress such a robust platform within the first place.
For context, WordPress powers greater than 40% of the online, and whereas any particular person or firm is free to take the open supply challenge and run a web site themselves, a lot of companies have sprung as much as promote internet hosting companies and technical experience off the again of it. These embody Automattic, which Mullenweg arrange in 2005 to monetize the challenge he’d created two years earlier; and WP Engine, a managed WordPress internet hosting supplier that has raised practically $300 million in funding over its 14-year historical past, the majority of which got here by way of a $250 million funding from personal fairness agency Silver Lake in 2018.
Talking this week at WordCamp US 2024, a WordPress-focused convention held in Portland, Oregon, Mullenweg pulled no punches in his criticism of WP Engine. Taking to the stage, Mullenweg learn out a publish he had simply printed to his private weblog, the place he factors to the distinct “5 for the longer term” funding pledges made by Automattic and WP Engine, with the former contributing 3,900 hours per week, and the latter contributing simply 40 hours.
Whereas he acknowledged that these figures are only a “proxy,” and won’t be completely correct, Mullenweg stated that this disparity in contributions is notable, as each Automattic and WP Engine “are roughly the identical measurement, with income within the ballpark of half-a-billion [dollars].”
Mullenweg has levelled criticism at a minimum of one different big-name net host up to now, accusing GoDaddy of profiteering from the open supply challenge with out giving something significant again — extra particularly, he known as GoDaddy a “parasitic firm” and an “existential risk to WordPress’ future”.
In his newest offensive, Mullenweg didn’t cease at WP Engine, he prolonged his criticism to the corporate’s major investor.
“The corporate [WP Engine] is managed by Silver Lake, a personal fairness agency with $102 billion in belongings underneath administration,” Mullenweg stated. “Silver Lake doesn’t give a dang about your open supply beliefs, it simply needs return on capital. So it’s at this level that I ask everybody within the WordPress neighborhood to go vote together with your pockets. Who’re you giving your cash to — somebody who’s going to nourish the ecosystem, or somebody who’s going to frack each little bit of worth out of it till it withers?”
In response to a query submitted by an viewers member later, asking for readability on whether or not Mullenweg was asking WordPress customers to boycott WP Engine, he stated that he hoped each WP Engine buyer would watch his presentation, and in terms of the time once they’re renewing their contracts, they need to take into consideration their subsequent steps.
“There’s some actually hungry different hosts — Hostinger, Bluehost Cloud, Pressable, and so forth, that will like to get that enterprise,” Mullenweg stated. “You would possibly get quicker efficiency even switching to another person, and migrating has by no means been simpler. That’s a part of the concept of knowledge liberation. It’s, like, at some point of labor to modify your web site to one thing else, and I might extremely encourage you to consider that when your contract renewal comes up, in the event you’re presently a buyer with WP Engine.”
‘A most cancers to WordPress’
In response to the brouhaha that adopted the speak, Mullenweg printed a comply with up weblog publish, the place he calls WP Engine a “most cancers” to WordPress. “It’s necessary to do not forget that unchecked, most cancers will unfold,” he wrote. “WP Engine is setting a poor commonplace that others might have a look at and assume is okay to duplicate.”
Mullenweg stated that WP Engine is profiting off the confusion that exists between the WordPress challenge and the industrial companies firm WP Engine.
“It must be stated and repeated: WP Engine is just not WordPress,” Mullenweg wrote. “My very own mom was confused and thought WP Engine was an official factor. Their branding, advertising, promoting, and whole promise to clients is that they’re providing you with WordPress, however they’re not. They usually’re profiting off of the confusion.”
Mullenweg additionally stated that WP Engine is actively promoting an inferior product, as a result of the core WordPress challenge shops each change that’s made to permit customers to revert their content material to a earlier model — one thing that WP Engine disables, as per its assist web page.
Whereas clients can request that revisions be enabled, assist solely extends to a few revisions, that are robotically deleted after 60 days. WP Engine recommends that clients use a “third-party modifying system” in the event that they want in depth revision administration. The explanation for this, in response to Mullenweg, is easy — saving cash.
“They disable revisions as a result of it prices them more cash to retailer the historical past of the modifications within the database, they usually don’t need to spend that to guard your content material,” Mullenweg contends. “It strikes to the very coronary heart of what WordPress does, they usually shatter it, the integrity of your content material. Should you make a mistake, you don’t have any approach to get your content material again, breaking the core promise of what WordPress does, which is handle and shield your content material.”
TechCrunch has reached out to WP Engine for remark, and can replace right here once we hear again.