Final month, I unintentionally began a motion. I used to be feeling annoyed that a couple of loud voices in tech had been creating the impression that our entire business had gone MAGA. In my frustration, I purchased a URL, wrote a three-paragraph pledge, put it in Google Kinds, designed a brand, constructed an internet site, and, with the assistance of mates, volunteers, and one very distinguished LP, collected signatures from greater than 100 enterprise capitalists—all in lower than every week. Upon its reveal, the “VCs for Kamala pledge” went viral and altered the dialog in our business. As of in the present day, greater than 850 VCs representing greater than $300 billion in belongings underneath administration, together with a who’s who of Silicon Valley, have signed.
Let me be the primary to confess that I’m an unlikely political voice of enterprise capital. For one factor, I’ve not been a VC for lengthy—I spent most of my profession as a founder and operator earlier than elevating my first fund in late 2020. I’m additionally an immigrant from Costa Rica who up till not too long ago couldn’t vote in America—this would be the second presidential election by which I can take part. What may shock you most of all is that I’m not even a Democrat. I’m an impartial voter whose beliefs had been formed in a really completely different tradition and don’t map cleanly to the American political spectrum.
The place VCs draw the road
So why would a average impartial who’s by no means been concerned in politics and runs a small fund on a shoestring finances tackle the loud, highly effective, deep-pocketed MAGA crowd? Actually, I’ve been asking myself that an increasing number of as of late. As a result of for the entire superb issues which have occurred since I gained this notoriety, I’ve additionally paid a steep value for it, shedding traders in my fund and changing into a goal to those that disagree with me—and even to some who’re on the identical facet. It’s solely been six weeks.
Then once more, I don’t normally make selections as a result of one thing is straightforward. And given the selection, I’d do it once more. As a result of this election is not only about coverage—it’s about character. And for VCs, it’s an acid take a look at for the place we draw the road on what sort of individual we’re keen to put money into.
I don’t assume I absolutely appreciated what an unimaginable privilege it’s to be a VC earlier than I began investing. I do know this sounds obnoxious, however it’s true. Being a VC means you’re a picker of future energy gamers, a minter of future millionaires, a seeder of applied sciences that all the world will probably be utilizing subsequent.
After all, to cite the nice Stan Lee, with nice energy comes nice accountability. VCs fund the dreamers and doers, however typically we fund the grifters, too. Usually this occurs by mistake—one thing is missed in diligence, somebody lies to you, and typically you actually simply can’t inform how a founder will react underneath excessive strain.
Then once more, typically you take a look at the end result of corporations within the information, and you must ask your self how these offers obtained accomplished. Are there VCs who’re keen to show a blind eye to main character issues, questionable ethics, and critical potential for damaging externalities in pursuit of cash, energy, and a sizzling deal? In that case, it’s essential to me that this kind of habits doesn’t characterize our business. And I feel all of us need VCs to take this a part of the job significantly, like our shared future trusted it. As a result of it does.
Evaluating presidential candidates
Which brings me to the election.
Earlier than I make a brand new funding, I ask myself what the world will seem like if and when that founder is massively profitable. It forces me to ask exhausting questions, uncover ethical hazard, and assume in a protracted sufficient time period horizon. Lately, I began making use of that very same lens to the presidential candidates. What would the nation seem like if Donald Trump had been massively profitable? The reply, to me, is an autocracy, the place alternative is granted to those that “kiss the ring,” with irreversible penalties on local weather change, ladies’s rights, and doubtlessly our republic itself.
That’s why the overwhelming help for “VCs for Kamala,” and the actual fact about one third of our signatories self-declared as independents or Republicans, doesn’t simply give me nice hope for our nation—it offers me nice hope for our business, too. In Kamala Harris, I see a candidate who’s providing dialogue, shifting to the middle, and combating to be a president for all. I see a steady-handed chief in her prime. I see somebody I might belief to look at my daughters.
I’m heartened to be taught that almost all VCs are actively doing our diligence, that we draw the road at egregiousness. That we pay attention when 16 Nobel economics laureates and Goldman Sachs itself predict that the financial system will fare higher underneath a Harris administration. That we care a couple of lady’s proper to decide on. That we help insurance policies that give extra individuals a good shot at entrepreneurship and the American dream.
That is the model of enterprise capital I signed up for, that I’m proud to talk for, and that I now consider represents the vast majority of our business.
Don’t let the MAGA crowd inform you in any other case.
Learn extra:
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t essentially replicate the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.